The good thing about kiwifarms showing up on fedi is a whole lot of people are outing themselves as shitbags wanting a kiss from the ban hammer.

The facts are thus: You don’t know what fucking happened. You weren’t there. One person says “A” and another person says “No, B!” And you weren’t there so you don’t know what happened.

I am also so so fed up with every time there is a shit storm of this magnitude someone self appoints themself as arbitrator of what is fact... on shit that happened when they were still in fucking high school.

As if this hasn’t been done by a thousand other people before them WITH THE SAME DAMN RESULTS.

elekk.xyz/@maloki/102412848490

Fuck Florence - For devs unrepentantly contributing to harassment, including repeating lies originating primarily via KF / ED... whilst simultaneously promoting a product that is supposed to make a “safer mastodon”.

Border Hell / Abuse / Neglect / Etc 

Spoilers: Passengers 

Spoilers: Passengers 

Spoilers: Passengers 

And I’m not talking about nazis because they shouldn’t be allowed on any platform...

The public platform as a whole is not your “safe space”. You can make yourself “safer” by using privacy tools to block people you don’t like and whatnot... control your own experience on the platform as much as possible... but you can’t eradicate their existence from the platform excepting if what they are doing is in violation of the TOS.

I don’t think people really understand the concept of what is / isn’t a safe space on the Internet. You can have private forums / groups which are moderated and where membership is controlled and there might be rules about who is / isn’t allowed in those spaces. You might consider that a “safe space”.

But you cannot ban people from using Facebook as a whole, say, because you don’t consider them safe enough to enter your group. Provided they arent in violation of the TOS.

sexual abuse 

sexual abuse 

sexual abuse 

Re: Natalie Durkin...

twitter.com/ajokermaybe/status

twitter.com/jetcat_jesus/statu

The first link is Natalie lying about a thing I remember happening and have pointed out was a whopper of a lie before. She scammed Kitty and later changed the story to say someone else did it. The second is Kitty, the person who was scammed out of said monies. Pretty sure Kitty knows who she paypaled the funds to. Just sayin’.

They Sim boosted

When people show double standards about ethical issues (Person A goes out with the garbage because of X behavior but Person B also engages in X behavior and is still “in”)... it just shows me that your outrage over behavior X is not genuine. You are using it as justification to make an outcast of Person A, but not Person B. Therefore you have ulterior motives that are really driving your vilification of Person A and you really don’t give a shit about behavior X.

They Sim boosted

fucked up that "every person should have their basic needs met regardless of if they work" is a radical idea

They Sim boosted

block reccomendation 

They Sim boosted

LOL, the job just put me onto Bob Ross Ipsum.

Ha, I'm so working with the right people.

bobrosslipsum.com/

Show more
Mastodon

tl;dr= no fascists, no bullying, no doing fucked up shit. You know what that means. Otherwise a lot of us are socialists, leftists etc. Dont bully people either. Or start witch hunts. You can have bots as long as administration clears them first The site is available on TOR! https://www.starrev3tah2dnhj.onion Note: letsencrypt won't sign a .onion domain cert so you will have to make a security exception as it uses the same cert for the main domain